Changing the Impact of Family
Rules
by
Kathlyne
Maki-Banmen
Our family-of-origin is the most important
place of learning about ourselves and the world before the age of 18. From our
families, we learn what we should hold as important and how we should behave.
We learn values from our families. These are
things which our families teach us are very important and which raise our
self-esteem as they resonate with our inner Self. An example of a family value
might be an appreciation for the beauty of nature; this resonates with our
connection to the universe. Another family value might be an appreciation for
humanitarianism which resonates with our connection to others through our
universal Life Force. A value for learning might resonate with our curiosity
and creativity. These values allow us to expand our definition of ourselves in
positive ways.
Some of what we learn from our families limits
our sense of Self. We refer to the lessons we learn about how to behave in the
world as family rules. These can be learned through explicit teaching. An
example of an explicitly learned family rule might be when your mother told
you, “Never talk back to your father”. We can also learn family rules
implicitly from the way that people respond to what goes on. For example, if
your mother becomes upset and has trouble coping whenever you are sad, you might
learn, “Never make mother sad”. Nobody told you this rule, but you picked it
up implicitly. Family rules are often couched in the absolute terms of “never”
and “always”. They often have a “should” attached to them.
Rules can be specific to different people in
the family. For example, father might have the rule that you must be the best
at whatever you do, while mother might have the rule that you must be modest and
never look better than others. This can create tremendous inner conflict as the
individual tries to follow both rules. Parents learn rules from their own
families-of-origin and may pass these down to their own children. The family
might also take on a cultural or religious rule and include it in the family’s
expectations. An example might be, “God will punish you if you lie”. The result
of trying to follow family rules is diminished self-esteem. There is a part of
the person which must be discounted in order to follow the family rule.
When our parents teach us these family rules,
they have a positive intention of trying to help us in some way to survive in
the world. For example, the rule “Never hurt anyone’s feelings” has the
intention of teaching us to accept and honor other people’s experiences, to be
compassionate and kind. However, the result of following such a rule results in
the person having to discount his or her own feelings in order to make others
feel good about themselves. This results in lowered self-esteem as the person
either feels unworthy of having his or her own feelings or resentful that his or
her feelings are not acknowledged and appreciated. We usually cope with family
rules by either following them, or by rebelling against them. Both methods of
coping are costly to self-esteem.
We often carry our family rules into our adult
lives without even realizing it and use them in our adult relationships. For
example, the rule, “Never talk back to authority figures” might become
problematic in the workplace in interactions with superiors.
When we look at the impact of family rules, we
see that they impact every level of internal experience. We can explore a
family rule through the Iceberg Metaphor to see what impact it has had on the
person. People are often unaware that they are following a family rule and that
it has a negative impact on them. They are also often unaware that the rule
may not fit for their present adult life.
If we take the rule, “Never get angry” and put
it through the Iceberg Metaphor, it might look like this:
Behaviour: Either smoothing
things over when the person is able to
stuff his or
her anger, or, if he or she is not able to stuff it,
then almost
out of control yelling and crying.
Coping: Placating or
blaming
Feelings: Angry, hurt,
scared, sad
Feelings about Feelings: Shame, embarrassment,
guilt, resentment
Perceptions: Of Self: Out of control, bad, crazy,
victim
Of Other: More important
than me, unreasonable, wrong
Of the World: Unfair, unsafe
Expectations: Of Self: Should be able to control my
anger.
Should be
more accepting of others.
Should be
more kind and calm.
Of Others: Should be more
accepting of me.
Should see
my side of the story.
Should tell
me I’m OK to have anger.
Other of me: I should stuff my
anger.
I should be
in control of myself.
I should
take care of them.
Yearnings: To be loved,
accepted, validated, respected.
Self: Out of touch
with my inner Self. Low Self –Esteem.
To help people change the impact of the family
rule, the therapist must first help them explore the impact of the rule through
the Iceberg, then have them accept that this is how they now experience
themselves when they follow this rule. The work does not focus on the rule, but
rather on the person and the impact the rule has had on them. If the
therapy is done experientially, the therapist can help the client to transform
his/her experience of the family rule.
Sometimes people cannot
initially see that the rule has a negative impact on their self-esteem. They
may say, “This is just the kind of person I am”. The therapist may have to help
the client de-enmesh him/herself from the rule and help him/her to see that
he/she is not the rule; it was just something that was taught to him/her. The
therapist might help the client to get in touch with his/her deeper Self and
help him/her to empower him/herself by accepting his/her uniqueness and inner
resources. The client may also need to find a way to fulfill some of the
yearnings, which have been turned into expectations. This might mean helping
the client find ways to love and accept him/herself more and take better
self-care of his/her inner world.
In looking at the impact of the
rule, the therapist may assist the client to look at the costs and payoffs of
the rule. While doing this, the therapist will keep the focus on the client’s
experience and growth. It is easy for clients to focus on the experience of
others rather than on themselves. The therapist might ask questions to open new
awarenesses and experiences such are, “While you are busy taking care of his
feelings, who’s taking care of yours?” When this is done experientially, it
helps people to come up against the emotional costs of the negative experience
and make new decisions for change.
In order to help them change the impact, the
therapist may need to help clients change their expectations, as family rules
are usually framed in the form of an expectation and, certainly, family rules
trigger peoples’ expectations of themselves and others. The therapist might
assist the client to let go of, change, or otherwise resolve an expectation,
which would allow the client to see new possibilities and choices for
him/herself. The client might also work on reframing perceptions and letting
go of reactive feeling such as anger, hurt, fear, guilt and shame. He/she will
also need to work on taking responsibility for being more in charge of his/her
inner experience, especially his/her feelings.
The client may also have to do
some work with letting go of his/her need to obey or be “loyal” to his/her
parents who taught him/her this rule. This can be done with an empty chair or
visualization where the client appreciates the positive intention of his or her
parent, gives back the rule to the parent and lets his or her parent know that
he/she will now make his/her own decisions for his/her life. He/she will then
tell the parent what new decisions he/she has made and how it will impact
his/her life differently.
The therapist will want to
anchor the transformation through every level of the Iceberg by asking the
client how they now experience their feelings, how they see themselves now, how
they see the other person now, what they have done with the expectation they
used to have, how they are now loving and accepting themselves, etc.
To anchor the changes in life, the therapist
will have the person imagine themselves in specific situation and report on what
will now be different. For example, “How will this impact your relationship
with your boss? How will you be different with her? What will you do
differently?”
The end result of changing the impact of family
rules is that the individual has choice and can decide for themselves how they
will behave in specific situations. He or she may still decide to repress
his/her anger, but will do it with an understanding that it does not mean that
the anger is not valid. The person may put the anger aside for the moment and
then deal with it later in a more appropriate setting or manner. The four goals
of therapy have been addressed and improved when the impact of the rule has been
dealt with:
1.
Self-esteem has been raised.
2.
The person is now taking responsibility for his/her inner experience and
his/her behaviour.
3.
The person is now capable of making choices in specific situations.
4.
The person is more congruent and more in charge of him/herself.
ã 2001 Kathlyne
Maki-Banmen